Carl Cramer is a recent hire at Derivatives Specialists Inc. (DSI), a small consulting firm that advises a variety
of institutions on the management of credit risk. Some of DSI's clients are very familiar with risk management
techniques whereas others are not. Cramer has been assigned the task of creating a handbook on credit risk,
its possible impact, and its management. His immediate supervisor, Christine McNally, will assist Cramer in the
creation of the handbook and will review it. Before she took a position at DSI, McNally advised banks and other
institutions on the use of value-at-risk (VAR) as well as credit-at-risk (CAR).
Cramer's first task is to address the basic dimensions of credit risk. He states that the first dimension of credit
risk is the probability of an event that will cause a loss. The second dimension of credit risk is the amount lost,
which is a function of the dollar amount recovered when a loss event occurs. Cramer recalls the considerable
difficulty he faced when transacting with Johnson Associates, a firm which defaulted on a contract with the
Grich Company. Grich forced Johnson Associates into bankruptcy and Johnson Associates was declared in
default of all its agreements. Unfortunately, DSI then had to wait until the bankruptcy court decided on all claims
before it could settle the agreement with Johnson Associates.
McNally mentions that Cramer should include a statement about the time dimension of credit risk. She states
that the two primary time dimensions of credit risk are current and future. Current credit risk relates to the
possibility of default on current obligations, while future credit risk relates to potential default on future
obligations. If a borrower defaults and claims bankruptcy, a creditor can file claims representing the face value
of current obligations and the present value of future obligations. Cramer adds that combining current and
potential credit risk analysis provides the firm's total credit risk exposure and that current credit risk is usually a
reliable predictor of a borrower's potential credit risk.
As DSI has clients with a variety of forward contracts, Cramer then addresses the credit risks associated with
forward agreements. Cramer states that long forward contracts gain in value when the market price of the
underlying increases above the contract price. McNally encourages Cramer to include an example of credit risk
and forward contracts in the handbook. She offers the following:
A forward contract sold by Palmer Securities has six months until the delivery date and a contract price of 50.
The underlying asset has no cash flows or storage costs and is currently priced at 50. In the contract, no funds
were exchanged upfront.
Cramer also describes how a client firm of DSI can control the credit risks in their derivatives transactions. He
writes that firms can make use of netting arrangements, create a special purpose vehicle, require collateral
from counterparties, and require a mark-to-market provision. McNally adds that Cramer should include a
discussion of some newer forms of credit protection in his handbook. McNally thinks credit derivatives
represent an opportunity for DSL She believes that one type of credit derivative that should figure prominently in
their handbook is total return swaps. She asserts that to purchase protection through a total return swap, the
holder of a credit asset will agree to pass the total return on the asset to the protection seller (e.g., a swap
dealer) in exchange for a single, fixed payment representing the discounted present value of expected cash
flows from the asset.
A DSI client, Weaver Trading, has a bond that they are concerned will increase in credit risk. Weaver would like
protection against this event in the form of a payment if the bond's yield spread increases beyond LIBOR plus
3%. Weaver Trading prefers a cash settlement.
Later that week, Cramer and McNally visit a client's headquarters and discuss the potential hedge of a bond
issued by Cuellar Motors. Cuellar manufactures and markets specialty luxury motorcycles. The client is
considering hedging the bond using a credit spread forward, because he is concerned that a downturn in the
economy could result in a default on the Cuellar bond. The client holds $2,000,000 in par of the Cuellar bond
and the bond's coupons are paid annually. The bond's current spread over the U.S. Treasury rate is 2.5%. The
characteristics of the forward contract are shown below.
Information on the Credit Spread Forward

Regarding their statements concerning current and future credit risk, determine whether Cramer and McNally
are correct or incorrect.