Question 1

A company has an application that ingests streaming dat
a. The company needs to analyze this stream over a 5-minute timeframe to evaluate the stream for anomalies with Random Cut Forest (RCF) and summarize the current count of status codes. The source and summarized data should be persisted for future use.
Which approach would enable the desired outcome while keeping data persistence costs low?

Options :

A : Ingest the data stream with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams. Have an AWS Lambda consumer evaluate the stream, collect the number status codes, and evaluate the data against a previously trained RCF model. Persist the source and results as a time series to Amazon DynamoDB.

B : Ingest the data stream with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams. Have a Kinesis Data Analytics application evaluate the stream over a 5-minute window using the RCF function and summarize the count of status codes. Persist the source and results to Amazon S3 through output delivery to Kinesis Data Firehouse

C : Ingest the data stream with Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose with a delivery frequency of 1 minute or 1 MB in Amazon S3. Ensure Amazon S3 triggers an event to invoke an AWS Lambda consumer that evaluates the batch data, collects the number status codes, and evaluates the data against a previously trained RCF model. Persist the source and results as a time series to Amazon DynamoDB.

D : Ingest the data stream with Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose with a delivery frequency of 5 minutes or 1 MB into Amazon S3. Have a Kinesis Data Analytics application evaluate the stream over a 1-minute window using the RCF function and summarize the count of status codes. Persist the results to Amazon S3 through a Kinesis Data Analytics output to an AWS Lambda integration.

Answer: B

Question 2

A company has a mobile app that has millions of users. The company wants to enhance the mobile app by including interactive data visualizations that show user trends. The data for visualization is stored in a large data lake with 50 million rows. Data that is used in the visualization should be no more than two hours old. Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

Options :

A :

Run an hourly batch process that renders user-specific data visualizations as static images that are stored in Amazon S3.

B :

Precompute aggregated data hourly. Store the data in Amazon DynamoDB. Render the data by using the D3.js JavaScript library.

C :

Embed an Amazon QuickSight Enterprise edition dashboard into the mobile app by using the QuickSight Embedding SDK. Refresh data in SPICE hourly.

D :

Run Amazon Athena queries behind an Amazon API Gateway API. Render the data by using the D3.js JavaScript library.

Answer: A

Question 3

A company developed a new elections reporting website that uses Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to deliver full logs from AWS WAF to an Amazon S3 bucket. The company is now seeking a low-cost option to perform this infrequent data analysis with visualizations of logs in a way that requires minimal development effort.
Which solution meets these requirements?

Options :

A : Use an AWS Glue crawler to create and update a table in the Glue data catalog from the logs. Use Athena to perform ad-hoc analyses and use Amazon QuickSight to develop data visualizations.

B : Create a second Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to deliver the log files to Amazon Elasticsearch Service (Amazon ES). Use Amazon ES to perform text-based searches of the logs for ad-hoc analyses and use Kibana for data visualizations.

C : Create an AWS Lambda function to convert the logs into .csv format. Then add the function to the Kinesis Data Firehose transformation configuration. Use Amazon Redshift to perform ad-hoc analyses of the logs using SQL queries and use Amazon QuickSight to develop data visualizations.

D : Create an Amazon EMR cluster and use Amazon S3 as the data source. Create an Apache Spark job to perform ad-hoc analyses and use Amazon QuickSight to develop data visualizations.

Answer: A

Question 4

An advertising company has a data lake that is built on Amazon S3. The company uses AWS Glue Data Catalog to maintain the metadat
a. The data lake is several years old and its overall size has increased exponentially as additional data sources and metadata are stored in the data lake. The data lake administrator wants to implement a mechanism to simplify permissions management between Amazon S3 and the Data Catalog to keep them in sync
Which solution will simplify permissions management with minimal development effort?

Options :

A : Set AWS Identity and Access Management (1AM) permissions tor AWS Glue

B : Use AWS Lake Formation permissions

C : Manage AWS Glue and S3 permissions by using bucket policies

D : Use Amazon Cognito user pools.

Answer: B

Question 5

An IOT company is collecting data from multiple sensors and is streaming the data to Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK). Each sensor type has its own topic, and each topic has the same number of partitions. The company is planning to turn on more sensors. However, the company wants to evaluate which sensor types are producing the most data sothat the company can scale accordingly. The company needs to know which sensor types have the largest values for the following metrics: ByteslnPerSec and MessageslnPerSec. Which level of monitoring for Amazon MSK will meet these requirements?

Options :

A : DEFAULT level

B : PER TOPIC PER BROKER level

C : PER BROKER level

D : PER TOPIC level

Answer: B