Your client provided the following sources: Source 1:Source 2:Source 3: As can be seen, the Product values present in sources 2 and 3 are similar and can be linked with the first extraction from ‘Media Buy Name’ in source1 The end goal is to achieve a final view of Product Group alongside Clicks and Sign Ups, as described below:Which two options will meet the client’s requirement and enable the desired view? 

A client's data consists of three data streams as follows: Data Stream A:The data streams should be linked together through a parent-child relationship. Out of the three data streams, Data Stream C is considered the source of truth for both the dimensions and measurements. The client would like to have a "Site Revenue" measurement. This measurement should return the highest revenue value per Site, for example: For Site Key ‘SK_C_2’, the "Site Revenue" should be $7.00. When aggregated by date, the "Site Revenue" measurement should return the total sum of the results of all sites. For example: For the date 1 Apr 2020, "Site Revenue" should be $11.00 (sum of Site Revenue for Site Keys ‘SK_C_1' ($4.00) and ‘SK_C_2’ ($7.00))Which options will yield the desired result;

A client wants to integrate their data within Marketing Cloud Intelligence to optimize their marketing insights and cross-channel marketing activity analysis. Below are details regarding the different data sources and the number of data streams required for each source.When harmonizing the Objective field from within the data stream mapping, which advantage is gained? 

What value does Datorama bring rather than building a similar solution in-house?

What are the three main aspects of a customer's business that Datorama can solve?