The outline SIAM model has been determined.

-ZYXS will be the service integrator

-The development teams from ZYXS and ZYXUK will merge to provide application development and support

services

-OUTSCO will provide a centralized service desk the wide area network and local area networks

-ZYXD will provide hosting services

-MAILSCO will provide e-mail services

-MOBSCO will provide desktop support for all users

The strategy is to transfer the current services to these named service providers as the legacy contracts expire

The CIO wants to ensure that the tooling strategy supports the corporate strategy

What would be the most appropriate tooling strategy*?

ZYXS has been selected as the service integrator. They will also provide some hosted application services, using ZYXD as a subcontractor. ZYXS will also provide a central service desk for the SIAM ecosystem. Considering ZYXS, which factor is most critical to the success of SIAM? 

The corporate strategy of ZYX contains these objectives: -Ensure delivery against contracts -Invest in and tram all ZYX staff -Reduce operating costs -Be ready to adapt to change The ZYX strategy requires that the costs of the service integrator should be as low as possible, and that service levels and high-quality services should be achieved at all times. The CEO wants the new SIAM model to be in place as soon as possible OUTSCO is a global provider of a range of services, including service integration They have a good reputation as a flexible and reliable service integrator who is willing to amend their SIAM model. They are in the last year of a 10-year contract to provide outsourced services to ZYXUK. Over the last two years the performance and quality of their services has decreased SIAMRUS is a global provider of service integration services in the manufacturing sector They use a standardized SIAM model with limited flexibility SIAMRUS recently created an outline SIAM strategy for ZYXUK: proposing that they should be the service integrator. ZYXS is experienced in the service management of corporate services including managing the delivery of service providers The ZYXS IT Director used to be a senior service manager in a small service integration company The ZYXS office location is almost at capacity with no possibility of expansion ZYXS are the developers of NEWBNK, which is strategic to the future of ZYX The CEO wants to retain as many of the existing service providers as possible Which is the most appropriate structure and sourcing approach for choosing the service integrator for ZYX?

The ZYX Board of Directors decided that the proposal from SIAMRUS for ZYXUK was not suitable to be used for the whole of the group, and asked the ZYXS IT Director to lead the creation of a new SIAM strategy. This new SIAM strategy has now been approved by the NEWGEN Executive Steering Board. What is the best approach to ensure that the ZYXUK Management Board supports the implementation of this SIAM Strategy? 

The SIAM Project Board has decided that a big bang implementation approach is unsuitable for ZYX What is the most likely reason for this decision?