Smartly Prepare Exam with Free Online TTA-V4 Practice Test

Subject to testing is a software system (COTS) for Project Administration and Control (PACS). PACS is a multi-project system for controlling the project time, e.g., in terms of scheduling and tracking, and managing the productivity of projects, e.g., in terms of effort and deliverables. During various interviews with stakeholders the following information was gathered: • Using PACS is not business critical. There is no impact such as high financial losses or problems to the operational continuity of an organization. Its application is not critical since the software package does not support directly the operational, or the primary, business processes of an organization. It supports (project) management in the project planning and tracking process. Of course, it will be highly annoying for users if the system “goes down” from time to time. Although this does not have a high impact for the business process as a whole, the Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) still needs to be at a good level to be successful in the market. • Users of PACS typically have an academic educational level, but have no prior experience with this particular type of project management software. The system will be used by a large number of users within an organization. • The system will be used on a regular basis, e.g., several times per day by project managers and several times per week by project employees. This means that the system will not be used very intensively, often only for some data input or an information request. Its usage is not considered to be very time-critical. • The data is recorded on-line and real-time. The system is expected to run in multiple hardware environments in various network environments. It is also expected that changes in the operational environments will happen in the upcoming period that also need to be supported. Based on the information provided by the stakeholder, which combination of non-functional quality characteristics should you propose to test as part of your test approach?

You have conducted static analysis on several new modules for an existing product. You are now executing test cases and are seeing inconsistent problems including crashes. Intermittent error messages are appearing. Despite all your best efforts, you are not able to find reproducible scenarios to force these errors. What problem in the code are you likely seeing?

You are planning an exploratory test session for the current sprint which includes the following user stories: User Story AA-008 As a booked customer of Alpha Airways I want to access an open flight reservation So that I can update the booking details User Story AA-012 As a booking clerk for Alpha Airways I want to access a customer's flight reservation So that i can view their reservation details what three things should be considered when creating the session's test charter? a)What are the user roles specified in the two user stories? b)What level of coverage and efficiency was should be achieved by the session’ c)Will the session fit within a 60 to 120 minutes time box’ d)Do Will the findings from the exploratory sessions need to be documented? e)What actions are performed by the user roles according to the acceptance criteria for these user stories’ f)Should the exploratory session be automated’ g)Has the Definition of Done been met for both user stories’ SELECT ONE OPTION

A component has been analysed during a risk-assessment and rated as highly critical. Which of the following white-box test techniques provides the highest level of coverage and could therefore be used to test this component?

Which of the following statements about fault seeding tools is correct?